Ask Should BMF.io have automated metrics to judge quality of posts made by publishers?

[boileen]

BMF.io should definitely consider having automated metrics to judge the quality of posts made by publishers. It helps maintain a certain standard across the platform without needing manual reviews all the time. Metrics like engagement rate, readability, originality, and even user feedback can give a good picture of what's working and what's not. So while automation can save time and catch obvious issues, it should be balanced with occasional human oversight to keep things fair and flexible

 

[Brajet]

Stuff like engagement, readability, originality, and relevance could be tracked without someone having to manually review everything. It'd give publishers quick feedback so they can step up their game, and it'd help catch spammy or low-effort posts, keeping things legit for readers. Of course, it can't replace humans completely and some stuff needs a real person to judge but having it in the background would make things way smoother