Ask How does one prove fraud via Meta Refresh on popunder ad campaign?

[Brajet]

It's always difficult to "prove" fraud but the best you can do is show reputable data logs of the traffic. So in your example if you are (hypothetically) being billed for 100 clicks but only see 55 visitors then export or screenshot your analytics and send them to your account rep. Programs like Prosper202, GetClicky, Google Analytics or your server logs are reputable.

You also mention the fraud could be taking place via meta refresh. Meta refreshing does not get rid of referrals 100% of the time. It only works about 90% of the time at erasing the referral. So you should be able to view your referral logs, identify some referring sites and visit them to check for anything suspicious.

 

[Anthony Joshua]

To prove fraud through Meta Refresh in a popunder ad campaign, you'd need to show that the redirect isn't genuine. Check your analytics for sudden traffic spikes, no engagement, or strange referral sources. If users never actually viewed your page but impressions were counted, that's a red flag. Recording server logs and comparing IPs can also expose fake views or automated refreshes designed to inflate results artificially.

 

[Felix😎]

To prove fraud via meta refresh in a popunder ad campaign, you can start by analyzing the traffic logs. Look for patterns like extremely short visit durations or repeated redirects from the same meta refresh code. This shows the traffic isn't genuine but artificially inflated. You can also track the referrer URLs—if they all come from suspicious or irrelevant sources, it's likely fraudulent. Tools like Google Analytics can help you spot these patterns.